Overcoming challenges in managing a high-risk pregnancy with placenta previa and newly diagnosed Bombay phenotype.

BACKGROUND: Bombay phenotype is rare and characterized by a lack of H antigen on the surface of red blood cells (RBCs) with naturally occurring anti-H antibodies. The presence of anti-H necessitates the exclusive use of Bombay phenotype RBCs for transfusion. We present a case of a pregnant woman with Bombay phenotype who required urgent cesarean section delivery due to high-risk placenta previa. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 36-year-old G1P0 woman of Indian origin presented at 36 weeks and 4 days gestation for management of a high-risk pregnancy with complete placenta previa. Bombay phenotype was unexpectedly identified on routine testing. Given the rarity of the blood, advanced gestation, and risk of post-partum hemorrhage associated with complete placenta previa and spontaneous labor, prompt strategic planning commenced for a successful delivery. Two frozen allogeneic Bombay phenotype RBCs were available as part of a concise transfusion plan. Intraoperative cell salvage was successfully employed and allogeneic transfusion was not required. CONCLUSION: Management of patients with rare blood types can be extremely challenging and guidance for those presenting later in pregnancy is scarce. Our patient's gestational age precluded the use of well-known effective strategies, including hemoglobin optimization, autologous and directed donation, and procurement of large quantities of rare blood. Rather, our approach utilized multidisciplinary expertise and strategic planning to yield a successful outcome.

Fatal Case of Heartland Virus Disease Acquired in the Mid-Atlantic Region, United States.

Heartland virus (HRTV) disease is an emerging tickborne illness in the midwestern and southern United States. We describe a reported fatal case of HRTV infection in the Maryland and Virginia region, states not widely recognized to have human HRTV disease cases. The range of HRTV could be expanding in the United States.

Differences in Surgery Classification and Indications for Peripartum Hysterectomy at a Major Academic Institution.

OBJECTIVE: Peripartum hysterectomy is associated with increased morbidity and mortality relative to elective gynecologic hysterectomy and its incidence has grown with the rising cesarean delivery rate. We sought to understand indications and perioperative outcomes for peripartum hysterectomy at our academic institution and to evaluate differences among racial/ethnic groups. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective chart review of women at a tertiary care center who underwent delivery of a newborn and had a peripartum hysterectomy during the same admission between 2008 and 2018. Demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic characteristics of patients were compared with respect to patient's race/ethnic group. RESULTS: A total of 112 hysterectomies were included in our study. White women undergoing peripartum hysterectomy were more likely to have had an elective/anticipated peripartum hysterectomy (vs. a nonelective/emergent peripartum hysterectomy) than Black women. There were racial differences detected in the indication for peripartum hysterectomy; White women were more likely to have abnormal placentation (75 vs. 54% in Black women, p = 0.036), whereas Black women were more likely to present with postpartum hemorrhage (27 vs. 2%, p = 0.002). Black women were also more likely to undergo reoperation after peripartum hysterectomy (15 vs. 2% in White women, p = 0.048). There were no differences in any other perioperative outcomes including blood transfusion, accidental laceration, and 30-day readmission. CONCLUSION: Differences exist among elective versus nonelective peripartum hysterectomy by race/ethnicity and in indications for peripartum hysterectomy by race/ethnicity. Further investigation should be performed to determine whether the differences identified are due to disparate management of atony/postpartum hemorrhage or inequitable referral patterns for suspected abnormal placentation by race/ethnicity. KEY POINTS: · White patients were more likely to have an elective hysterectomy when compared with Black women.. · Abnormal placentation was the indication more often for White patients; hemorrhage for Black ones.. · Black patients were likely to be nulliparous or at greater gestational age at the time of hysterectomy..